Perhaps maybe she would say " Oh damn i didnt bother telling him terrorism could get him sent to prision when he was a child. Ive failed as a mother."
She would have to have been raised a Westener to even be able to consider it that way (aside from having to figure out what 'prision' is
). Even if such a feat of un-culturally-backward (ie. subjective, individual, relativistic) thinking were possible, it's doubtful that it would happen. How many people do you know that are able to look at themselves critically, who are able to connect the dots when it comes to their faults and the manifold negative results that follow? It's not something that ever caught on.
Anyway, as long as the lass doesn't attempt to set up a prison-break, she can show her grief in any way she pleases if it's up to me.
What must be done is set an example to the other idiots.
Perhaps, but I'm not so sure it's working. 'Examples' aren't really doing the trick, so far. They surely help in setting/feeding some bad blood and grudges, but I don't think they're working as a deterrent.
.. deny him his martyrdom that he so desperately wants, while remaining above his level.
That's where we agree, mostly on the latter part. The 'remaining above his level' is what counts for me, although I have a feeling that if (a significant) part of the reasoning behind an act is to make it as bad as possible to
their standards (however much out of sync with one's own), there's something to be said for deducting points on the 'moral highground'-score here. IMO it beats a public lynching ofcourse, or blowing up some buildings/innocent people in retaliation, but that should go without saying.