Regarding somebody's question i'm from blighty so it wasn't released here till last week
more importantlly i hate much like pho playing games on crappy resolutions, i'd much rather be able to max everything out and have it purring like a kitten
as for Bioshock it is going to be one of those games you either love or hate but so far the plus points for me have been
1. It's freeform, so your not restricted to going wherever you like ( always a plus as i hate FPS's that are on rails)
2. The weapons / plasmid combo's are upto you i.e if you like pulling things close with the telekinesis plasmid then blowing the crap out of them with the shotgun then you can, if you like just being some kind of plasmid mage you can do that too
3. the sheer scope of the game, seriously it's bloody huge
and now the negative points
i have a Duel Core 2.8Ghz Processor, two geforce 6600gt sli cards with the link thingy, 2gb of ram
and the sucker stutter's slightly when there's a lot on screen and that's with the maximum setting on
so my bad points
1. It's seriously power hungery, more so than the demo
2. if you haven't got a decent graphics setup don't bother with it
3. if you buy it be prepared to lose your social life
as i have had it since the 25th of august and haven't left the house
am i sad quite possibly
however if you like FPS shooters you can't go wrong with bioshock, it's cleverly written, deeply immersive and (and this is the major point ) it's fun
unlike HL2 and D3 or even Q4 which allthough i like
always had me being directed to the next objective / mission which didn't really give much scope for exploring or creating my own story.
is it however worth the hype, ummm not really
it's what happens when somebody combines Oblivion with Half Life 2 and removes the barriers and although it's fun (while it lasts) it's not the best thing ever