No there's not, although I'd like for there to be.

And I'll move this to the Gen page for ya.

Nobody's server was running that second stats program for a long time.

I'd love to see it up on central.

We have only ONE server running statistics and everyone that plays in that one server knows it. Here is what has happened throughout the years:
Stats were really interesting at the beginning, then after a few months, no one even talked about it anymore, but I still check regularly mainly to check how I am doing and see how I am doing agaist a particular player.
People who take this seriously usually have a couple different names, one to play seriously and others to have fun (basically at the beginning when Stats were interesting, now people dont bother) EXAMPLE Flu to play seriously, Flu-50 to play with 50 handicap, it is actually quite interesting to see what difference a handicap makes :-)
Most people understand that ping differences account for disbalance of the statistics, EX: I am ahead of the statistics of MANY players that are from Europe, if the stats was running in their server in Europe, I KNOW I wouldnt be as lucky
I am also aware many good players play at a specific time where realy good players play, which tend to lower their statistics while I play at ANY time inluding hours were lesser players may play, thus statistics may look better.
After a while, statistics mean only one thing- A really good way to gauge yourself and have fun, I really have NEVER seen anyone pissing people off and bragging in our forums, but I know the potential is there.

I think most of the old timers are used to statistics and know how to use them, I used to play on TEN, which had some of the best statistics I have seen, Rocketman's, old painkeep (quake1), etc. I don't remember ever been a problem.

I just wnated it for xample to see how well I do with specific weapons against different players, it helps me decide what to use on encounters and what to watch out for :-)

Like I said- Just checking :-)

No matter how small or pleasant the community, stats always have adverse effects on at the very least a few players' chivalry and honourability. Just like Phoenix states, they hardly depict the true skill of a player, due to newbie-slaughter et cetera. I've found that from all these statistics, efficiency is the best measure for one's skill, as it not only takes the frags in account, but also the ability to stay alive -- even so, this is typically driven up by chatkilling and the other aforementioned 'strategies'.

This all depends on the server and the game, too: Q3A-FFA can be tons of fun when it's tense and tough - like the server for the stats I spammed - Everyone goes head-to-head, nearly everyone chatkills the rare player that stands about, but this hardly happens, because everyone on the server is driven, experienced & skilled. There are rarely newbies to pound on (tis after all only the hardcore players that still actively play vanilla Q3).
Which brings me to Generations Arena: There's no hardcore competition, nearly half of our playerbase is either playing for fun and games, practice etc. or for nostalgia values.
The few times a skilled player hopped on the server and applied 'tactics' to improve their chances of winning (ie. chatkilling, going arena only, picking on the new guys), the fun was pretty much destroyed. In addition, there's no set times when 'the good players' are active. Nearly every game I played was with widely varying player skills.

As annoyed as I was last night about having to face a whole host of Earthers racking up easy frags, it compares in no way to the trained Q3 player popping in for a few games, showing off his Q3 skills with the default weapons, picking on the weaker players, whining, then popping off again. This kind of competitiveness I want to reduce or avoid at all costs. Ask yourself who of the competing players would use a handicap to keep things balanced, when there's the stats to think of? :]

Now the (personal) weapon statistics, I've always been in favour of, since they're just like the accuracy value displayed in the scoreboard -- but useful. They don't do anything but tell you what would be a pest to keep track of manually.

For a tournament? Interesting: yes. Valuable: no. A tournament is based on winning and frags, so keeping track of efficiency or weapon statistics would serve no purpose. Since the players would be playing very competitively anyway, it would do no harm either.

Statistics are a good way of looking over one's game, but not all statistics are the best ones. Like Tabun said, efficency is the key, and statistics (if they're implemented) ought to show that rather than ones that are less meaningful or related to efficency.

For example, let's say that a player has a 66% hit-to-miss ratio with the railgun. This looks like a good statistic to have, but the depth of its meaning says very little about how well the player is doing in the game. It could mean that the player only shot 3 rails and missed one, or shot 33 rails, missing 11. How does this good ratio contribute to the player's overall performance? Not much, if by comparison they have a kill/death ratio of 7/22.

Mods like OSP do show more significant statistics, like damage given & damage recieved. Other mods display FPH (Frags Per Hour). UT2004 keeps the scoreboard simple & clean by only displaying the score, kills and deaths of players. These are examples of what I think are good statistics since they give a more accurate portrayal of a player's performance in comparison to accuracy ratios, epsecially when one considers how many shots are intended to redirect a player's movement, or are simply guessing (SPAM =p) shots.