2024-12-22, 09:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Wirehead Studios > General Discussion > Off-Topic > Graphic Cards (Which should I use?)
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Graphic Cards (Which should I use?)  (Read 7798 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
shambler
 
Icon of Sin
**********
Posts: 999
« on: 2005-01-29, 15:01 »
I am rebiulding my No 2 computer at the moment, with a new case, new hard drive etc as these are about 5 years old and not as many bays, over heats a bit  etc, you know how it is...

Anyway, It's an 800mgz slot 1 processer,  with 640 ram, used for UT99 and Gen basically.

I can use eather my Voodoo 5500 PCI or an Nvidia mx440 128mgs from BAT.  Which card should I use?

I have tried them both and they both seem about the same quality in UT, but I can't deside

Any ideas guys?
Logged
Lordbane2110
 
Chton
*******
Posts: 225
« Reply #1 on: 2005-01-29, 16:54 »
well i'd use the nvidia as you can get better drivers for it

plus you have better options

the voodoo is better for gl support though
Logged
Footman
 

Beta Tester
Icon of Sin
***********
Posts: 784

WWW
« Reply #2 on: 2005-01-29, 20:22 »
On a related note, my dad brought up something interesting when I was shopping for a new graphics card.

He thought a ATi Radeon 9200 128mb card would've been a better deal. I went with a GeForce FX 5200 256mb card instead. Did I make the right choice here?
« Last Edit: 2005-01-29, 20:23 by Footman » Logged
Phoenix
Bird of Fire
 

Team Member
Elite (7.5k+)
*********
Posts: 8815

WWW
« Reply #3 on: 2005-01-30, 03:13 »
Off the top of my feathered head, I'd say more video RAM = "teh win".  The 5200's aren't stellar, but neither are the 9200's.  Could check around, I think [H]ardOCP might have some comparisons between the two cards.
Logged

I fly into the night, on wings of fire burning bright...
shambler
 
Icon of Sin
**********
Posts: 999
« Reply #4 on: 2005-01-30, 14:20 »
well,  I have fitted the mx440 and the latest drivers and it runs ut 2004 a lot better.  All else seems to run at the same speed so it'll stay in.
Logged
Footman
 

Beta Tester
Icon of Sin
***********
Posts: 784

WWW
« Reply #5 on: 2005-01-30, 18:03 »
Quote from: Phoenix
Off the top of my feathered head, I'd say more video RAM = "teh win".  The 5200's aren't stellar, but neither are the 9200's.  Could check around, I think [H]ardOCP might have some comparisons between the two cards.
Thanks, I'll check that out.
I only had $130 to work with. Slipgate - Tongue
Logged
games keeper
 

Elite
*
Posts: 1375
« Reply #6 on: 2005-01-30, 22:28 »
I thought the 5200 256mb was slower then the 5200 128mb ?
Logged
shambler
 
Icon of Sin
**********
Posts: 999
« Reply #7 on: 2005-01-31, 17:11 »
Intresting...

I have had a day of work with sickness and the runs and so I have gone and bougt a geforce fx 5200   128mg   for ?37 and fitted the entire slot 1 800mgz PC in a case I got off BAT for ?30. (blue lights, side fan etc). The card runs ut2004 really  well compared to the old voodoo 5500 (due to the direct 3D what a suprise)

I can't understand why I didn't do this long ago.
Logged
Footman
 

Beta Tester
Icon of Sin
***********
Posts: 784

WWW
« Reply #8 on: 2005-01-31, 17:24 »
Voodoo 5500 isn't exactly high end. ;P
It's not even mid-range.
Logged
shambler
 
Icon of Sin
**********
Posts: 999
« Reply #9 on: 2005-01-31, 22:05 »
was when i bought it. really don't know why i didn't sort this out sooner. I think i had just convinced myself it was as good as anything else. like some kind of mental block. I'm puzzeled
Logged
games keeper
 

Elite
*
Posts: 1375
« Reply #10 on: 2005-02-01, 18:14 »
now think what it would have done if you bought a 6800U   Thumbs up!
Logged
shambler
 
Icon of Sin
**********
Posts: 999
« Reply #11 on: 2005-02-01, 23:56 »
I plan to wait a year or so and then biuld my next PC. The 9800 pro will do me for a while longer I think.

The 5200 will run the older PC well enough for the odd time we botn play ut2004.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to: