2024-12-22, 09:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mozilla Firebird (Get it, use it, love it)  (Read 10444 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ConfusedUs
 

Elite (2k+)
**
Posts: 2358

WWW
« on: 2003-11-21, 05:59 »

Firebird blows IE out of the water. Tabbed browsing, automatic popup blocker, built in google searchbar, skinnable, and there's about 130 extentions to do whatever you want, or you can write your own.

http://texturizer.net/firebird/index.html

I recommend the Tabbrowser Extentions and the Click for Flash extention.
Logged
dna
 
Shub-Niggurath
**********
Posts: 673

WWW
« Reply #1 on: 2003-11-21, 15:22 »

Not to get into a big discussion about if it's better or not, but IE6 actually seems speedier to me.  
May Bill put in a extra "feature" to retard Netscape?
Logged
ConfusedUs
 

Elite (2k+)
**
Posts: 2358

WWW
« Reply #2 on: 2003-11-21, 21:06 »

It takes an extra 2 or 3 seconds to load on my computer, true.

But its worth it. I love the browser. It takes a bit of getting used to, but it's awesome.
Logged
OoBeY
 
Hans Grosse
*******
Posts: 299

« Reply #3 on: 2003-11-22, 04:07 »

Tempting, but I've gotten to know IE over the years, and don't feel like learning a new browser, and more importantly, if the fighting between WMP, QT, and RealOne is an indication, I don't even want to know what will happen if I try to get windows to accept a third party browser.
Logged
dna
 
Shub-Niggurath
**********
Posts: 673

WWW
« Reply #4 on: 2003-11-22, 04:54 »

Actually, I was surprised at how easy it was to manage the two.  You just have to uncheck the boxes that ask to let them be the default browser.  Pick one and stick with it, though you can always use the other by design if you choose.
I still say it's just plain slower even while browsing.
Logged
ConfusedUs
 

Elite (2k+)
**
Posts: 2358

WWW
« Reply #5 on: 2003-11-22, 06:22 »

It runs fine for me. It takes about 3 seconds longer to load than IE on initial load, but is not slow at all in loading pages or surfing. It runs like a breeze, rarely crashes, hides those annoying flash ads, and blocks popups. I love it!
Logged
Phoenix
Bird of Fire
 

Team Member
Elite (7.5k+)
*********
Posts: 8815

WWW
« Reply #6 on: 2003-11-22, 06:58 »

I know I'll be using it soon enough.  As for things loading fast/slow in IE, there are some registry tweaks you can do to improve your data rate.  I don't know what they are for 2000/XP, but for 98 I went in, hacked the registry, and my maxrate went from 80kb/s to over 300.  I can also run 6 or more streams to a server as opposed to the normal "2" that's standard.  Pages load damned fast for me with IE right now.  If Firebird is a hair slower I'll give up some speed for increased stability and the ability to run javascript without popups.
Logged


I fly into the night, on wings of fire burning bright...
McDeth
 

Makron
********
Posts: 388

Wildly Inappropriate

« Reply #7 on: 2003-11-22, 07:36 »

It absolutely rules. I can't thank Con enough for pointing me in the right direction.
Logged

Beer? I'm down.
dna
 
Shub-Niggurath
**********
Posts: 673

WWW
« Reply #8 on: 2003-11-22, 14:27 »

I haven't had pop-ups since I started using Zone Alarm.
I mean. hey, you need a fire wall anyway... And IE has been pretty stable for me with 2000 and XP (more so wih 2000 - XP still feels like they're using me for beta testing).
I dunno, Mozilla has some interesting features, but the main reason I am starting to use it would be the supposed better security.  Otherwise, it wouldn't matter to me at all.
Logged
OoBeY
 
Hans Grosse
*******
Posts: 299

« Reply #9 on: 2003-11-22, 21:39 »

Ok this is pretty cool.
Logged
WolfCub
 

Pinky
**
Posts: 30

WWW
« Reply #10 on: 2003-11-24, 02:22 »

I use Mozilla the most, blows everything else away. I also have FireBird, but I like regular Mozilla better. On my Linux drive, I have Konqueror, Galeon, and Opera as well as the rest. Mozilla still beats them all. 1.6B is out on the FTP, go get it!
Logged
Kain-Xavier
 

Beta Tester
Icon of Sin
***********
Posts: 917

« Reply #11 on: 2003-11-24, 06:19 »

I like what I've seen so far.  The speed seems pretty decent too.  I think the way it caches files is a bit clunky though.  It's nice that they included a cache explorer command, but I think it's rather pointless to make me re-download a large animation file or movie when it's already cached on my hard drive.  Eh that's just me though.  I love Flash animation and I always burn my favorites to CD.
« Last Edit: 2003-11-24, 06:19 by Kain-Xavier » Logged

Lilazzkicker
 

Beta Tester
Quad God
**********
Posts: 571

WWW
« Reply #12 on: 2003-11-24, 15:59 »

It seems to work ok, but I need to snag the plugins.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: